Jupiter Neptune Conjunction in Aquarius May 2009

Jupiter Neptune Conjunction in Aquarius May 2009

On May 28th 2009, at 6:05am AEST Australia, Jupiter conjuncts Neptune at 26 degrees Aquarius. Also at 26 degrees Aquarius is Chiron, the healer. Besides these three at 26 degrees Aquarius, is Mars at 26 degrees Aries. Mars will mostly add energy for a quick change to the whole configuration.

300px-caravaggio_jupiter_neptune_pluto

Jupiter makes big, huge in fact, any thing that comes across it’s path. And there is nebulous Neptune, minding her own business right on that path. Aquarians are not particularly orthodox in their interactions so expect major exposures of strange and erratic behaviours. Politics, drugs, movie stars, major illnesses will hit the headlines.

If you have planets at 26 degrees, especially Aquarius, Leo, or Aries watch the antics of those around you. If you are involved in humanitarian, publishing, or performance art, that warning goes double. If you are living your truth, this will blow wide open any doors you have been trying to open. The more serendipitous or strange the connection, the bigger the change it will wrought in your life. Just remember: change is good. It keeps you moving.

There’s an element of trust to this change. If Saturn was involved or one of the other planets, I’d say “preparation” or “study” or “commonsense”. But with Jupiter/Neptune, it’s “trust”. Let go, go with it, keep moving, change is good,  live your dreams, dream your life, that’s all that Jupiter and Neptune meeting up in Aquarius want. And Chiron is there to heal the way.

Mercury is slowing down again getting ready to turn direct from it’s retrograde. Mercury retrograde ends on May 31st at 11:21 AM AEST, Australia.
Please join me on Twitter Star_Sparkles

3 Replies to “Jupiter Neptune Conjunction in Aquarius May 2009”

  1. I noticed that when Julia Gillard came to power as Prime Minister it was open slthear for people ie, both men and women to comment on her looks. Did we worry or concern ourselves with the looks or lack of them of our previous male Prime Ministers No! My reply was she makes herself presentable for the job and that is all she need do. Why do we have to care? Why do we have to judge women on their looks, but not men? This is just one small thread of prejudical thinking that annoys me. Yes a woman and a man can enjoy making themselves look nice; thats all fine but do we have to judge the capacity for competence in women and make that measurement how they look?

Leave a Reply